Nuclear: Includes base costs, nuclear waste disposal, and long-term management. Renewables: Accounts for grid adaptation, such as storage and transmission upgrades for variability Coal: Reflects costs including environmental mitigation measures like emissions controls. For countries with abundant sunshine and wind, focusing on renewables is often the most cost- effective and sustainable strategy. Investing in solar and wind infrastructure, alongside energy storage and grid adaptation, can meet energy demands while minimizing environmental impact. Nuclear may not be practical due to its high setup costs, waste management challenges, and the added expense of shipping waste overseas. However, nuclear could still play a role as a backup in scenarios where renewable output is inconsistent Reducing reliance on coal and gas remains crucial, paired with a transition plan that prioritizes clean technologies. Policies should be tailored to each nation’s natural resources and economic realities, ensuring a resilient, low-cost energy future.

Conclusion by AI